The SLTA’s call for a change in the Rangers V Celtic Hogmanay Fixture has been refused by the SPFL following a “curt” reply from the SPFL Chief Executive, Neil Doncaster.
Despite highlighting a number of our concerns, the only show of concern from Mr. Doncaster was directed at the timing of the SLTA’s complaint, rather than the possible impact this fixture could have on Glasgow, its residents and businesses and in fact the rest of the country.
Mr. Doncaster’s response demonstrates a great deal of narrowmindedness as it appears that all that matters is the game itself, not the run-up or aftermath.
The recent announcement that this fixture was chosen by a firm’s computer in the USA is just unbelievable. Does a computer have information on the history of the volatility of fixtures between Rangers and Celtic and the social impact such fixtures bring?
The Scottish Licensed Trade Association would also take issue with the reported comment from Police Scotland that “…the early kick off limits the potential for over-consumption of alcohol, which can help reduce anti-social behaviour or violence”. In our view this is absolute nonsense. The earlier the game the more likelihood there is of increasing over-consumption of alcohol. Fans going to the game, no matter what the time of the kick off, will be less likely to be under the influence to ensure they get into the ground. The more time after the game, the longer the opportunity to consume alcohol.
We do however agree with Police Scotland’s comment on transport issues – “…the transport infrastructure will be operating normally whereas a reduced service would be in place on January 1st”. That is another reason why the SLTA called for the game to be played on either 2nd or 3rd of January.
All reported comments from the SPFL and Police Scotland seemed to be focused on the game itself. What about the impact on the citizens and businesses in Glasgow faced with the aftermath of the game?